Notes
Essays and working notes
Shorter pieces that connect the concepts, publications, and applied work of the programme.
7 November 2026 · 4 min read
Hva bør vi utrustes med i møte med kunstig intelligens?
Kritisk tenkning, dyp domenekunnskap, etisk forankring og teknologisk forståelse: hva vi trenger for å vurdere KI og ta ansvar for hvordan den brukes.
4 November 2026 · 8 min read
When the System Raises an Alarm but Cannot Explain Why
A Microsoft Power Platform notification as a case of automated certainty and institutional irresponsibility—and what it reveals about the duty to explain.
3 November 2026 · 6 min read
Beyond Hermeneutical Housekeeping: A Diagnostic Method for AI, Governance, and Human Agency
A four-stage diagnostic method for examining how technological and institutional systems reshape the conditions for human judgment, agency, and responsibility.
2 November 2026 · 5 min read
The Silent Automation of Professional Judgment: Why Efficiency Metrics Threaten the Future of Formation
How automated recommendations, shifting burdens of proof, and efficiency targets can weaken professional judgment—and what institutions can do to protect its formation.
27 October 2026 · 6 min read
When AI Helps Us Think, Who Is Responsible for What We Know?
Scientific knowledge has always depended on tools, collaboration, and trust. Artificial intelligence brings a new question into focus: what happens when we remain responsible for conclusions we can no longer adequately explain?
21 October 2026 · 5 min read
Derivative Epistemic Agency: When AI Helps Write the Science, Who Can Still Answer for It?
A new article published in JMIR Metascience and Research Integrity argues that the real risk of AI in research is not plagiarism or hallucination, but authors who remain formally responsible for claims they can no longer fully answer for.
14 October 2026 · 5 min lesetid
Før dømmekraft, handling og ansvar
Hva må være på plass før menneskelig dømmekraft, handling og ansvar kan utøves? Om forståelse, handlingsrom og institusjonene som gjør dem mulige.
14 October 2026 · 2 min lesetid
Mennesket i endring: Hva skjer med frihet, kunnskap og ansvar når verden forvandles?
Når teknologi, sosiale relasjoner og institusjonelle praksiser endrer seg, utfordres det teoretiske fundamentet som filosofien har hvilt på.
14 October 2026 · 5 min lesetid
Når kategoriene brister: Hva skjer med kunnskap, handling og ansvar i den algoritmisk medierte tidsalder?
Hva skjer med kunnskap, handling og ansvar når algoritmer og institusjonelle infrastrukturer utfordrer filosofiens etablerte kategorier?
10 September 2026 · 11 min read
Research Premises: A Philosophy of Licensed Transitions
The governing question of the research programme: under what conditions is the transition from one epistemic, normative, evaluative, or agential status to another genuinely licensed?
7 September 2026 · 5 min read
When Responsibility Cannot Arise
A new article in AI and Ethics argues that algorithmic mediation can erode the preconditions of moral imputability itself — so that responsibility does not merely go unassigned but cannot arise at all.
29 August 2026 · 6 min read
Comparative Desire and Social Violence
A new article in Philosophy & Social Criticism argues that comparative relations do not merely shape responses to unequal outcomes but constitute the sense of entitlement through which those outcomes are experienced as unfair.
24 August 2026 · 5 min read
When responsibility is real: exercisable answerability
Exercisable answerability distinguishes being formally assigned responsibility from actually being able to answer for what has been done — and explains why retaining a human decision-maker is not enough to preserve human judgment.
11 August 2026 · 9 min read
The Vocabulary in One Piece: How the Concepts Fit Together
A single walk through the working vocabulary of the programme — inferential license, judgment gap, the partition thesis, ethical disclosure, comparative entitlement formation, post-mimetic relationality, epistemic infrastructure, systemic friction, and automated certainty — and how each concept depends on the others.